**Is it possible to be in love with more then one person**: a friendly debate Pt.4 (the conclusion) by J. Camps, NYC Rob and KV Sart

Pt. 1
Pt. 2
Pt. 3

Finally, we have (not) reached a conclusion to the question: is it possible to be in love with more then one person? 

**Is it possible to be in love with more then one person**: a friendly debate Pt. 3 by J. Camps, NYC Rob, and KV Sart

Check out Pt 1 and Pt 2. 


And we're back. NYC Rob has finally brought out the shotty! At this point, nobody knows what anyone else is talking about and the discussion has turned into a shouting match that will end in nuclear destruction, or maybe just NYC Rob getting knocked off his high horse of love. It is finally clear that no conclusion will be reached. We still must chastise one another for no reason. 

**Is it possible to be in love with more then one person**: a friendly debate Pt. 2 by J. Camps, NYC Rob, and KV Sart

Now that pleasantries have been exchanged, the Wannabe Writers have cocked back and are now firing at each other at will. So much for a friendly debate. They can't even agree on a definition of love, how is a conclusion supposed to be reached? Still, there are some valid points made by all parties, few of which are accepted by all. 

Make sure to read Pt. 1 before you jump into Pt. 2

**Is it possible to be in love with more then one person**: a friendly debate- Pt. 1 by Jersey Campbell, NYC Robert, and KV Sart

We've got another friendly discussion between a few of the Wannabe Writers who regularly contribute to VW. KV Sart joins the discourse between NYC Robert and Jersey Campbell as they try to figure out if it is possible to be in love with more then one person simultaneously. 

In Pt. I, the opening statements are made by each party and they establish their positions on the subject. Read, and be merry.